Basic prevention

July 28, 2021

In March 2020, politicians shut the world down on pandemic orders from the WHO.
It did not take many seconds from the shutdown before the talk went on that vaccines had to be developed that could free us from this covid-19 disease.
It was established from the outset that the disease could neither be prevented nor treated. There was only isolation until the saving vaccine came.
It was “The one-legged stool”, as mentioned in our newsletter feb. 21, 2021.

If anything was fake news, it was this.
But for inexplicable reasons it became the standing narrative, which was so sacred that one was shamed and censored if one doubted this worldview.

All over the world, doctors were prevented from rescuing their patients by early prevention and treatment of covid-19.
It sounds crazy that one has censored and prevented harmless methods of prevention and treatment before it goes so wrong that the patient has to be hospitalized.
Do the authorities really want people to get so ill that they have to be hospitalized?
Some of these harmless methods are even well documented, yet it is branded as “fake news” when it is publicly mentioned and the doctors in question are quarantined on Facebook and YouTube.

However, measures such as shutdowns and face masks are blindly accepted, even though there is very little documentation of the effect.
Health authorities as well as politicians from all over the world have loudly and sacredly emphasized that we must follow the science, and the world’s all-round experts have been shown on TV to give the authorities’ actions a tinge of science.

But when it comes to shutdowns, mink killings, face masks, PCR testing and the so-called vaccine, which is in fact a gene therapy, these highly praised scientific principles have failed.
We have even come so far that the population must be humiliated with testing or subjected to experimental gene therapy in order to preserve its civil rights.
Every thinking person must ask oneself: Tell me, what is going on?

If you want to try to get an overview of this madness, it is recommended to spend time watching: https://www.markmallett.com/blog/following-the-science/, which is a serious TV review of the conflict between science and the active deception of the authorities.

The Vitality Council is fortunately uncensored, and in the newsletter May 2020, there was a comprehensive overview of the supplements with which one could prevent a serious Covid-19 course.
The main thing is that the immune system must not lack these basic nutrients. On the other hand, a well-functioning immune system has the great advantage that it can quickly adapt to a new mutation of the virus and adjust its counter-attack to it.
A vaccine is specially designed for a specific type of virus, and must be reconstructed and adjusted if a new VOC (“virus of concern”, ie mutations that are viewed with concern) varies so much from the previous one that the vaccine does not work.
We see this at this time at home and abroad, where fully vaccinated people are admitted with severe covid-19.
This would not happen if the entire population had a well-functioning immune system that can quickly adjust the target to the new variant.
Then you only need to vaccinate the 2% who are in the absolute risk group.

But one thing is to prevent serious flu or Covid-19. Something else is the prevention of the major killer diseases like cancer and cardiovascular disease.
These disorders have been underdiagnosed during the Covid-19 pandemic, which must necessarily become a problem for the healthcare system in the coming years.
But then it is fortunate that many of the supplements that the Vitality Council recommended 1½ years ago also reduce the risk of these diseases.
This is not really so strange, for many diseases start with the process called inflammation. And it can be prevented to a great extent.
Regarding Covid-19, it starts with the immunological reaction to viral infection, the excessive reaction, the cytokine storm and then the whole inflammatory process.
In cardiovascular disease it starts with inflammation of the vessel wall and oxidation of LDL cholesterol, and in cancer it starts with inflammation of the cells in an oxygen-poor area, which then changes the metabolism in the mitochondria from aerobic and efficient energy production to anaerobic sugar fermentation and low energy production.
Therefore, if you focus on inhibiting the inflammatory processes that should not be in the body, then you are well on your way to preventing the large, life-threatening diseases, and at the same time you get to inhibit the development of viral diseases so that they do not develop in a fatal direction.
Therefore, if I have to come up with an all-round recommendation as a basis, then it will be:

  • A multivitamin-mineral product without iron
  • Plus extra Selenium, so the daily dose comes up to 150 µg
  • Plus extra vitamin D, so the daily dose is up to 100 µg (this is only the maintenance dose if you are not in deficit. Otherwise you need more.)
  • Plus extra vitamin C, so the daily dose comes up to 2,000 mg
  • Plus extra Magnesium, so the daily dose comes up to 500 mg
  • Fish oil (but not necessary if you eat fatty fish every day)
  • Lactic acid bacteria

This basic supplement can ensure that you do not run a deficit for the body’s performance of tits basic functions, including the processes of the immune system.

If, on top of this, you are exposed to infection, which we have all been at intervals in the last 1½ year, then you can for a period supplement with:

  • Vitamin A: 1 mg
  • Vitamin B6: 5 mg
  • Vitamin C: 3,000 mg
  • Vitamin D3: 100 µg
  • Selenium: 100 µg
  • Zinc: 30 mg.
  • Echinacea 20 drops 2 x dgl.

This ensures that the immune system is well-supplied, despite increasing consumption, and then inhibits the cytokine storm, which can be life-threatening for the elderly and weak.

And the very basics of a good immune system are of course:

  • A healthy diet
  • Daily exercise
  • 7-8 hours of sleep
  • Freedom from smoke
  • Moderation
  • A positive outlook on life

Take care of yourself and others.

Claus Hancke MD
Specialist in general medicine

A second wave of Corona epidemic is coming

That is why we need to be prepared

May 20, 2020

The Corona virus will return. Of course it will.

When and how bad it will be, we do not know, but it will come.

Curiously enough, most people expect the second wave this fall – what we are not being told is that this is because the population’s vitamin D level again will be low at that time that we also call the “flu season”.

One of Europe’s experts capabilities on Covid-19, Professor Christian Drosten of the Charité Institute at the University of Berlin, even thinks that the second wave could be tougher than the current one.

But should we then sit with our hands in our laps and wait for a vaccine?’
No, no and again no.

We must, of course, do everything we can to boost every Dane’s immune system so that we are “armed to the teeth” and can prevent a severe epidemic.

Well, isn’t it precisely an overreaction of the immune system (a cytokine storm) that kills lung patients? Yes. If they are vitamin-depleted, then it will happen.

However, several of the vitamins and minerals I have mentioned will specifically inhibit this cytokine storm from the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which releases the inflammatory cytokines. Here, vitamin D and magnesium, selenium and the antioxidant vitamins are particularly important as they inhibit this cytokine storm and the subsequent inflammatory microcoagulation seen in the pulmonary vessels. It was described a week ago thoroughly in the Lancet by Prof. Dennis McGonagle and colleagues. They describe how there is actually inflammatory coagulation in the pulmonary vessels, rather than a pneumonia. Of course, this causes oxygen deficiency and such coagulation cannot be treated with a respirator. McGonagle and colleagues call it a diffuse alveolar and pulmonary interstitial inflammation in COVID-19 resulting in a macrophage activation that triggers extensive immunothrombosis.

Thus, according to this article, it is an inflammation-triggered immune response that leads to microcoagulation in the lungs, and that is what Covid-19 patients die from. This is interesting because this reaction can be dampened by vitamin D, selenium, magnesium and vitamin C.

Some of these substances have direct antiviral properties. We see this confirmed in the few scientific studies that are already published, as mentioned in the previous newsletters. The higher the level of intake (within a safe limit), the lower the mortality rate. Therefore, it is important to have high enough vitamin / mineral content for the immune system to be so effective that it will not cause severe lung disease. The more effectively we can prevent disease, the less we need treatment. The previous three newsletters have dealt with Vitamin D, Selenium and Zinc. Now we come to one of the cornerstones of human survival, namely Vitamin C. It is also called “ascorbic acid” after “a-scorbut”, ie against scurvy.

In the past, just as with other vitamins, these were believed to only protect against a deficiency of that vitamin. Thus, it was believed that vitamin C merely protected against scurvy, ie vitamin C deficiency.

However, the past 60-70 years of research have shown that vitamins (and certain minerals) have completely different and quite potent therapeutic properties when dosed accordingly.

Vitamin C is essential for our immune system, which has been documented in over 1,000 scientific articles. Finding evidence is not difficult. Rather, one must know how to limit oneself when searching.

Some of these articles are listed in the literature list. I have included a few old ones for historical reasons. After all, it is interesting that Frederick Klenner with high-dose vitamin C cured children from active polio, while here in Denmark we put them in iron lungs (the respirator of that time), while letting the virus rage in the body. Klenner killed the virus.

Another classic is Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling’s classic “The common cold …”, which created a great debate for and against.
Since that time, the scientific evidence has been well established and unanimously shows that vitamin C is essential for a well-functioning immune system.

Vitamin C has many extraordinary properties in that it can not only prevent disease but also be used in disease treatment.

If we are to concentrate on the current Covid-19 pandemic, then several serious studies around the world are using ascorbic acid intravenously to treat severe Covid-19 disease.

Contrary to the often heard mantra, “we have no treatment to offer Covid-19 patients”.

Well, we have.

It is true, however, that there are no gold standard randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies published in reputable, peer-reviewed, medical journals. But come-on.

This is a completely harmless treatment with an extremely cheap, natural vitamin for a potentially fatal disease.

If the seriously ill Covid-19 patients have to wait for the above publication, then they will be dead. Why not try it when it can never hurt them? If doctors are nervous about the legal aspect, use Article 37 of the Helsinki Declaration on compassionate care. Here, the doctor’s judgment applies.

The theoretical basis for the antiviral effect of vitamin C is present, along with a second-to-none safety track record. There is even more than 70 years of clinical experience from doctors who have used ascorbic acid for a variety of diseases, including severe viral infections. In addition, a large number of scientific studies, which more than indicate that Vitamin C has a place in the treatment of viral infections.

The least that could be done was to do a pilot study with 10 patients hospitalized with severe Covid-19 disease and compare with 10 who did not receive vitamin C. All 20 patients would receive the standard treatment available today.
Then you can compare mortality, hospitalization time, and recovery time.
The study can be completed in a month within a general medical department’s budget. It can hardly be more simple.

But that is perhaps the problem.

The first four newsletters have dealt with optimization of the immune system using vitamin D, Selenium, Magnesium, Zinc and Vitamin C.

The next newsletter will summarize our knowledge of the Covid-19 pandemic and conclude with a comprehensive overview of what you can take if you want to be highly equipped with an optimally functioning immune system as the next virus threat approaches.

Take care of yourself and others,

Claus Hancke, MD,
Specialist in general medicine

Refs.

  • Alberto Boretti, Bimal Krishna Banik (2020) Intravenous vitamin C for reduction of cytokines storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome PharmaNutrition. 2020 Jun;12:100190.  Published online 2020 Apr 21.
  • Cannell JJ, Zasloff M, Garland CF et al. (2008) On the epidemiology of influenza. Virol J. 2008;5:29.
  • Carr AC, Maggini S. Vitamin C and immune function. Nutrients 2017;9(11):1211.
  • Chambial S et al (2013) Vitamin C in Disease Prevention and Cure: An Overview. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013 Oct; 28(4): 314–328.
  • Gerber, WF (1975) Effect of ascorbic acid, sodium salicylate and caffeine on the serum interferon level in response to viral infection. Pharmacology, 13: 228
  • Gonzalez MJ, Berdiel MJ, Duconge J (2018) High dose vitamin C and influenza: A case report.  J Orthomol Med. June, 2018, 33(3).
  • Gorton HC, Jarvis K (1999) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing and relieving the symptoms of virus-induced respiratory infections. J Manip Physiol Ther, 22:8, 530-533
  • Hemilä H (2003) Vitamin C and SARS coronavirus Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Volume 52, Issue 6, December 2003, Pages 1049–1050
  • Hunt C et al. The clinical effects of Vitamin C supplementation in elderly hospitalised patients with acute respiratory infections. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1994;64:212-19.
  • Kennes B, Dumont I, Brohee D, Hubert C, Neve P (1983) Effect of vitamin C supplements on cell-mediated immunity in old people. Gerontology. 29:305-310.
  • Klenner F 1949, Southern Medicine & Surgery, Volume 111, Number 7, July, 1949, pp. 209-214
  • Li W1, Maeda N, Beck MA. (2006) Vitamin C deficiency increases the lung pathology of influenza virus-infected gulo-/- mice, J Nutr. 2006 Oct;136(10):2611-6.
  • McGonagle D et al, 2020, Immune mechanisms of pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy in COVID-19 pneumonia. Lancet May 7, 2020:1-9
  • Pauling L (1971) Vitamin C and the common cold Can Med Assoc J. 1971 Sep 4; 105(5): 448, 450.
  • Wintergerst ES, Maggini S, Hornig DH (2006) Immune-enhancing role of vitamin C and zinc and effect on clinical conditions. Ann Nutr Metab. 50:85-94.
  • Yejin Kim, Hyemin Kim, Seyeon Bae et al. (2013) Vitamin C is an essential factor on the anti-viral immune responses through the production of interferon-α/β at the initial stage of influenza A virus (H3N2) infection. Immune Netw. 13:70-74.

Contradictions about vitamins

 April 26, 2012

One may wonder about the Danish newspapers’ poor interest in the latest vitamin report. First of all, the report predicts dead to those who take vitamin pills, secondly, the turn-over for vitamins is one and a half billion kroner a year. The subject must interest many.

Here the report itself will not be discussed. It is already commented. On the other hand, attention must be paid to a very serious issue concerning the marketing of the report: The contradictory statements that a prominent researcher has used the report to make.

The statements are from chief physician Christian Gluud from Rigshospitalet. He has previously said peculiar things. It’s hard to forget how he on television declared antioxidants (like vitamin E and vitamin C) to be carcinogenic, even when they occur in fruit and vegetables. However, in fruit and vegetables there was, he believed, “a lot of other substances that might either correct the potential damage caused by the antioxidants or that could completely neutralize them.”

You might consider this amusing statement the next time you eat broccoli. It is thus an antidote to vitamins, you are eating!

Currently, Gluud said on TV that his latest study, which combined the results of different trials, is based on trials with commonly recommended vitamin doses. And yet, in almost all trials, there were used from five to twenty times the recommended dose or more.

Gluud has further said (the news program Deadline 2.4.2012) that his group has revealed that, for example, the antioxidants Vitamin C and selenium are directly life threatening, as they increase mortality by 4%. And yet, his report frees both of the two antioxidants for this accusation.

In the TV2 news (22.3.2012) Gluud said that “it’s quite common vitamin pills in very common doses that give the increased mortality.” But in an interview with Medwatch.dk he said the opposite: He could not comment on that subject – that multivitamins increase mortality – because no one had studied it!

If you ask chief physician Gluud, you may obviously get the answer that his current state of mind indicates. One moment, common vitamin pills are dangerous poisons, the next, it is not known, and at one time, selenium and vitamin C are poisonous, but at another time and towards another audience – those who read the report – they are harmless.

The contradictions do not prevent Gluud from hoping that the report will have “a practical and industry related consequence,” as he says. What that means is easy to understand. Gluud is/has been chairman of a lobby group that has sought to influence the European Commission to prevent the free sale of vitamins. They must be made into drugs, which in practice will push small vitamin companies out of the lucrative market, which alone in Europe is more than $ 20 billion a year.

When a researcher is politicizing, he invariably throws a dubious light over his research, justly or not. Worse, however, is when the researcher is facing the public, on a topic of great importance, against better knowledge.

In doing so makes him disqualified.

By. Niels Hertz, M.D

Early old age without vitamins and minerals

January 15, 2007

Without sufficient vitamins and minerals, old age comes too early. This is because the organism ignores the future when resources are limited. If it needs to, it does what is best for the present.

Keep an eye on Bruce Ames, the American biochemist and professor from Berkeley University. He is the man behind the worldwide renown Ames test, a quick method of establishing whether or not substances in food and the environment are cancerous, which is to say whether or not they cause mutation. He is also the author of uncountable numbers of scientific articles and has proposed some very important hypothesises in the field of nutrition. In 1999 President Clinton handed him the “American Nobel prise,” the National Medal of Science, for his contributions. At an age of 78, Ames is still extremely active.

Ames is among those who insist that there is, in uncountable ways, relationships between shortages of vitamins and minerals and cancer, mutations, and aging. But earlier than others, he also sought to explain these relationships bio chemically. It is highly important that we turn to long term studies involving thousands of people for these biomechanical mechanisms to be tested. When Ames invented his mutation test, he simplified detection of cancerous substances with one blow. Long term animal studies became unnecessary. Now he also wants to make long term human studies unnecessary in the study of nutritional deprivation.

The relationship between nutritional deprivation and cancer has been documented with extensive references in last November’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. For example, mutations, cancer, and early aging are seen early in association with magnesium deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency is believed to be the reason for 29% of all cancer in men. There is a relationship between deficiency of n-3 fatty acids from fish oil and malignant melanoma (skin caner), between selenium deficiency and cancer, and between potassium deficiency and heart disease. Lack of the B vitamin folic acid, vitamin B12, thiamine, and niacin also are associated with mutations and cancer. Even iron deficiency leads to mutations.

If all of this, and more, is an expression of a causal relationship, then nutrient deficiency should naturally be combated. Deficiency is, as we all know, extremely widespread. We receive large amounts of carbohydrates and fats, but few vitamins and minerals. One in every two Americans receive less magnesium than recommended, 90% receive too little vitamin E, 30% receive too little vitamin C, and so on… and so on.

Mutations can wait
If these many nutrient deficiencies are really the reasons for cancer, aging, and mutation, than what is the explanation? According to Ames, cells, and therefore the organs that they compose, prioritise when they temporarily or permanently lack something. A cell which as a result of a deficiency cannot accomplish all of its tasks, choose, for example, to prioritise the production of energy over the reparation of mutations. Correspondingly, scarce resources cause the organism to prioritise the production of red blood cells over the production of white blood cells, which is to say over immune system maintenance. The principle behind this is the same as when blood is directed to vital organs, such as the heart and lung, after blood loss. The organism must survive now, even though the price is weakening in the long term.

Prioritising is nonetheless only one reason for mutation and aging. A more direct connection is that nutrient deficiencies cause problems for the cells’ energy factories, the mitochondria. They are weakened by vitamin B (biotin) deficiency, pantoic acid deficiency, riboflavin deficiency, B6 deficiency, among others. Without these nutrients, the mitochondria cannot produce the enzymes necessary for energy production. Without energy nothing works in the cell, including the defence against mutation

Ames and others are now trying to find out how much nutrients we need to hold the number of mutations to a minimum and to keep the our mitochondria intact. This is not easy, but it is easier than undertaking expensive, and in many ways, uncertain, decade(s) long population studies. Also, who would finance such expensive studies?

In recent years we have seen a number of studies of supplementary vitamins E and C, selenium, beta-carotene, and vitamin A. Many of these were poorly done, more have been misinterpreted, and some have been proven. Few have become wiser. Is this the way forward? Or has Ames again shown a better shortcut?

While we wait for better knowledge, we should, according to Ames, take reasonable supplements of vitamins and minerals. Everything points towards that this is wise. And there are no risks.

By: Niels Hertz, MD

Reference:
Ames B. Low micronutrient intake may accelerate the degenerative diseases of aging through allocation of scarce micronutrients by triage. PNAS 2006; 103:17589-94.

www.pnas.org

Vitamins against aging

January 9, 2006

The need for many vitamins increases with age. A deficiency can be compared to radiation exposure, which causes mutations, decreased energy production, cancer, and age-related changes in the body, according to one of the World’s leading nutrition scientists.

When Bruce Ames was 70, President Clinton surprised him with U.S.A.’s highest scientific recognition, The National Medal of Science, for his research in nutrition, cancer, and aging.

Today he is 77, but still an almost incomprehensibility active researcher and professor at the famous Berkeley University in California. He is also the man behind the world renown Ames test, a lightning fast method to find out whether a specific chemical can cause mutations, and thereby cancer.

This introduction shows that Ames it a researcher to be listen to, and therefore we have decided to discuss one of Ames’s latest and most important scientific articles.

The article was published in a periodical for the European organization of molecular biologists (EMBO reports). It describes how it is possible to reduce the tendency for cancer and aging by taking more than the recommended dose of diverse vitamins and other important substances.

How does it do this? In his study Ames found that deficiencies of vitamins C, E, B6, and B12 as well as of folic acid and zinc can have exactly the same effect on cells as radioactivity. This means that such deficiency causes mutations, for example as a result of breakage of the chromosomes.

Folic acid deficiency causes such breakage because it leads to the introduction of a wrong substance (uracil) in uncountable places along the DNA molecules. These mutations affect the cells the same way as a virus affects a computer. In the worst cases, the system beaks down.

But deficiency does not only lead to mutations. Another result is weakening of the energy producing mitochondria, otherwise known as the cells’ power plants. In order for the mitochondria to function, they must have access to certain enzymes, which can be regarded as the power plant’s machinery. The enzymes work together so that the product from one “machine” is processed further by the next in a chain of reactions which result in the conversation of oxygen and hydrogen into water, and the production of energy. But where do the enzymes come from? Without the necessary building blocks they do not exist at all!

Ames has among other things proven that deficiencies of zinc or the B vitamins biotin and pantothenic acid weaken the fourth reaction in this chain of reactions. They are the building blocks of the “machines” which carry out this step in the process. Not only is the production of energy reduced by such deficiency, but oxygen is also insufficiently converted to water. As a result the mitochondria empty free radicals into the surrounding cell where they can cause mutations, cancer, and weakness.

More Energy
Why does Ames believe that it is necessary to take more vitamins than recommended? This is as a result of the third and last point in his thought process. It regards the consequence of the uncountable mutations which by the aforementioned methods unavoidably arise during ones life. These mutations cause the cells to produce less effective enzymes that bind less effectively to the vitamins which they need to aid their function. Ames maintains that this poor binding can be overcome simply by increasing the amount of vitamins. This makes the enzymes work again.

A particular problem in this regard is the weakening of the mitochondria which occurs with age. Without energy, nothing functions within the cell and the degeneration of the mitochondria is central to what we call aging. But Ames emphasizes that it is possible to make old rats faster by giving them supplements of the two vitamin-like substances lipoic acid and carnitine.

Both substances are important intermediates for energy production in the mitochondria. With age they bind poorly to the enzymes which cause the mitochondria to function poorly. But this poor binding can also be overcome with supplements. As well as making the rats faster it was possible to measure that their mitochondria once again functioned normally. Clinically such treatment has been able to result in improvement in people with mild Alzheimer’s.

The unique thing about Ames is that his arguments are based on biochemistry. This means that he refers to elementary chemical reactions which are demonstrable in the organism. Many others base their views of more or less uncertain clinical trails, sometimes without knowledge of the biochemistry behind them. It might not be coincidental that The Nobel Prise in medicine typically is given to a biochemist.

By: Vitality Council

References:
1. Bruce N Ames. Increasing longevity by tuning up metabolism. EMBO reports 2005;6:S20- S23.
2. Memory loss in old rats is associated with brain mitochondrial decay and RNA/DNA oxidation: Partial reversal by feeding acetyl-L-carnitine and/or R-a-lipoic acid. J. Liu et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.2002;99:2356-61.
3. B N Ames et al. High-dose vitamins stimulate variant enzymes with decreased coenzyme-binding affinity (increased Km): Relevance to genetic diseases and polymorphisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:616-58.

Ridiculous vitamin pills?

June 21, 2005

In (Danish) Morning-TV they laugh about the Americans’ enriched foods. But American researchers take vitamins serious.

Now, the TV News channel TV2’s nutrition expert, Orla Zinck, has once again been on morning TV. He had returned from the United States, bringing some of the American’s ridiculous, vitamin-enriched foods. There is of course plenty of healthy food.

The light ironic tone remained. You could understand, for example, that all you get from taking extra vitamin C is severe diarrhea. You have to stay permanently in the toilet. It’s not true, but it sounds funny. And when you ridicule what you oppose, you make it sound like you’re right ….

Elsewhere in the world it is taken a little more seriously. Below follows what is thought at one of the world’s most recognized universities, Harvard University in the USA. Harvard has an official website on vitamins: www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/vitamins.html. It is intended for e.g. doctors, who can probably assess the seriousness a little better than the majority of Danish Morning TV’s viewers.

The website opens with a statement: “If you eat healthy, do you need to take vitamins? Not many years ago, most experts would have answered emphatically “No”. Today there is solid documentation that a daily vitamin pill makes sense for most adults”.

But what new has happened? asks the article. Yes, it has been discovered that vitamins do not just prevent deficiency diseases such as scurvy and beriberi. Several of them are also likely to prevent heart disease, cancer, osteoporosis and other chronic diseases – if you get more than what is needed to avoid deficiency disease! The Harvard website concentrates on this new knowledge.

One section is about the B vitamin folic acid. It appears that folic acid not only prevents atherosclerosis and heart disease, but also cancer (in the colon and breast). Apparently it also negates the greatly increased breast cancer risk that women get from alcohol in even moderate amounts.

In the US, many foods are fortified with folic acid, but the article supports that you also take supplements so that you reach at least 400 micrograms per day. “Vitamin supplements are becoming more and more important”, it says.

Vitamin B12 is recommended in a daily dose of 6 micrograms, so far more than is normally recommended. It is mentioned that many elderly people have a B12 deficiency and, as a result, impaired memory. They may be disoriented and perhaps hallucinating in addition to having sensory disturbances in the feet. Sometimes people mistakenly think they have Alzheimer’s.

Regarding vitamin C, it is said that a pattern is emerging regarding the effect, and “as more knowledge is gained, an intake of 2-300 mg per day seems to be a goal worth striving for” , is it called. This is 3-4 times as much as Danes get in their diet and twice as much as in a regular diet, supplemented with a multivitamin pill.

Vitamin E is recommended in a dose of 400 units – or more – per day. It is 20 times as much as in the diet or in a multivitamin pill. This will very conceivably prevent heart disease, it is said.

Regarding vitamin D, it is mentioned that the optimal intake is 25 micrograms (1,000 units) per day. That is five times what is in a “full daily dose” vitamin pill. The purpose is to prevent the tendency to fall, osteoporosis and presumably cancer.

Through Danish TV2’s Morning TV, you get the impression that only uninformed people take vitamin pills, and it was made into something that was a bit laughable in the broadcast.

But the experts from one of the world’s leading universities, from which a stream of vitamin research emanates, think there is nothing to laugh about.

By: Vitality Council

References:
1. (Danish) Good Morning TV, 16 June 2005.
2. Harvard University, USA; official website about vitamins:
www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/vitamins.html

Multivitamins May Reduce HIV Death Rate

December 12, 2003

A placebo controlled study made by scientists at the The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine shows that a daily supplement of vitamins and minerals can reduce the HIV death rate. According to the scientists this may have great relevance for the treatment of HIV patients in countries which do not have access to optimal medical therapy.

The number of HIV infected persons continues to rise at a lightning speed. Worldwide, there are almost 5 million that are infected with HIV every year. In Denmark, 250-300 people are diagnosed with HIV every year, and the number is increasing. According to the AIDS Fund, there are approximately 4,500 HIV infected in Denmark, of which only 1,500 are in medical treatment.

In the latest issue of the journal AIDS, the results of a new startling study are published. 481 HIV-infected men and women participated in the study. All participants were from Thailand and none were receiving medical treatment for HIV.

The participants were divided into two groups, one of which received a placebo (cheat pill) and the other a special supplement of vitamins, minerals and amino acids. The participants were followed for a total of 48 weeks, with follow-up every 12 weeks.

After 48 weeks of treatment, the results showed a significantly lower mortality in the group that received the active treatment.

This is the first time that reduced mortality has been demonstrated by giving something as simple and cheap as multivitamins/minerals to HIV patients. It is a very strong and thought-provoking result”, says the chairman of the Vitality Council, medical specialist Dr. Claus Hancke.

Traditional medical treatment costs approx. 100,000 DK kr. per year for each patient. The treatment extends the HIV-infected person’s life on average by 6-7 years.

Other studies have shown that multivitamins/minerals can increase the body’s resistance, and now it turns out that it also provides better survival. Further documentation needs to be on the table, but already now patient associations such as HIV-Danmark should inform their members about the result“, says Claus Hancke.

By: Vitality Council

Reference:
AIDS (17 (17):2461-2469).

www.hivinfo.dk
www.iom.dk

DNA damage from micronutrient deficiencies is likely to be a major cause of cancer

Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20
Review
Bruce N. Ames
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3202, USA
Received 11 May 2000;
received in revised form 10 August 2000;
accepted 8 November 2000

Abstract

A deficiency of any of the micronutrients: folic acid, Vitamin B12, Vitamin B6, niacin, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, iron, or zinc, mimics radiation in damaging DNA by causing single- and double-strand breaks, oxidative lesions, or both. For example, the percentage of the US population that has a low intake (<50% of the RDA) for each of these eight micronutrients ranges from 2 to >20%.

A level of folate deficiency causing chromosome breaks was present in approximately 10% of the US population, and in a much higher percentage of the poor. Folate deficiency causes extensive incorporation of uracil into human DNA (4 million/cell), leading to chromosomal breaks. This mechanism is the likely cause of the increased colon cancer risk associated with low folate intake. Some evidence, and mechanistic considerations, suggest that Vitamin B12 (14% US elderly) and B6 (10% of US) deficiencies also cause high uracil and chromosome breaks.

Micronutrient deficiency may explain, in good part, why the quarter of the population that eats the fewest fruits and vegetables (five portions a day is advised) has about double the cancer rate for most types of cancer when compared to the quarter with the highest intake.

For example, 80% of American children and adolescents and 68% of adults do not eat five portions a day. Common micronutrient deficiencies are likely to damage DNA by the same mechanism as radiation and many chemicals, appear to be orders of magnitude more important, and should be compared for perspective. Remedying micronutrient deficiencies should lead to a major improvement in health and an increase in longevity at low cost.

1. Introduction
Approximately 40 micronutrients (the vitamins, essential minerals and other compounds required in small amounts for normal metabolism) are required in the human diet [1]. For each micronutrient, metabolic harmony requires an optimal intake (i.e. to give maximal life span); deficiency distorts metabolism in numerous and complicated ways many of which may lead to DNA damage.

The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) [2–4] of a micronutrient is mainly based on information on acute effects, because the optimum amount for long term health is generally not known. For many micronutrients, a sizable percentage of the population is deficient relative to the current RDA [5]. Remedying these deficiencies, which can be done at low cost, is likely to lead to a major improvement in health and an increase in longevity.

The optimum intake of a micronutrient can vary with age and genetic constitution, state of well being, and be influenced by other aspects of diet. Determining these optima, and remedying deficiencies, and in some cases excesses, will be a major public health project for the coming decades.

Long term health is also influenced by many other aspects of diet. Though this paper uses most examples from the US, the situation seems similar in many other countries. Micronutrient deficiency can mimic radiation (or chemicals) in damaging DNA by causing single-and double-strand breaks, or oxidative lesions, or both.

Chromosomal aberrations such as double strand breaks are a strong predictive factor for human cancer [6]. Those micronutrients whose deficiency mimics radiation are folic acid, B12, B6, niacin, C, E, iron, and zinc, with the laboratory evidence ranging from likely to compelling.

The percentage of the US population, for example, that is deficient (<50% of the RDA) for each of these eight micronutrients ranges from 2 to >20%, and may comprise in toto a considerable percentage of the US population (Table 1).

We have used <50% of the US RDA as a measure of low intake because these numbers are available [5]. However, the level of each micronutrient that minimizes DNA damage remains to be determined. Micronutrient deficiency is a plausible explanation for the strong epidemiological evidence that shows an association between low consumption of fruits and vegetables and cancer at most sites.

2. Dietary fruits and vegetables and cancer prevention
Greater consumption of fruits and vegetables is associated with a lower risk of degenerative diseases including cancer, cardiovascular disease, cataracts, and brain dysfunction [7].

More than 200 studies in the epidemiological literature have been reviewed and show, with great consistency, an association between low consumption of fruits and vegetables and the incidence of cancer [8–10]. The quarter of the population with the lowest dietary intake of fruits and vegetables has roughly twice the cancer rate for most types of cancer (lung, larynx, oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, bladder, pancreas, cervix, and ovary [8] when compared to the quarter with the highest intake.

In a different survey, the lowest quartile of adults consumed 2.7 portions or less and the highest quartile 5.6 portions or more (Krebs–Smith, personal communication). These observations are consistent with data on the Seventh Day Adventists, who are non-smokers and mostly vegetarians, and have about half the cancer mortality rate and a longer life span, than the average American [11].

About 80% of American children and adolescents [12]: and 68% of adults [13] did not meet the intake recommended by the National Cancer Institute and the National Research Council: five servings of fruits and vegetables per day. Publicity about hundreds of minor hypothetical risks, such as that from pesticide residues in the diet [14], has contributed to a lack of perspective on disease prevention.

Half of Americans do not list fruit and vegetable consumption as a protective factor against cancer [15] and two-thirds think that for good health only two servings per day need to be consumed [16]. Fruit and vegetable consumption is lowest among the poor, for example, African-Americans in the US [13,17].

Many components of fruits and vegetables may be responsible for their protective effect; such as micronutrients, plant phenolics, and fiber. This paper argues that inadequate intake of many micronutrients, such as folic acid, Vitamin C and B6 contributes to DNA damage, cancer, and degenerative disease.

A major part of the protective effect of fruits and vegetables may be due to their micronutrient content. In addition, dietary deficiencies of micronutrients whose sources are not primarily fruits and vegetables, such as zinc, iron, niacin, Vitamin E, and Vitamin B12, also appear to contribute to DNA damage and are also common in the US population. Other micronutrients are likely to be added to this list in the coming years.

3. Folic acid
Folate deficiency, a common vitamin deficiency in people who eat few fruits and vegetables, causes chromosome breaks in human genes [18]. Approximately, 10% of the US population [19,20] are deficient at the level causing chromosome breaks in humans. In two small studies of low income (mainly African-American) elderly [21] and adolescents [22] done nearly 20 years ago about half had a folate deficiency at this level, though the issue should be reexamined.

(B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 9, 10 / B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20)

The mechanism of chromosome breaks has now been shown to be deficient methylation of uracil to thymine, and subsequent incorporation of uracil into human DNA (4 million/cell) [18]. Uracil in DNA is excised by a repair glycosylase with the formation of a transient single-strand break in the DNA; two opposing single-strand breaks cause a double-strand chromosome break, which is difficult to repair. Both high DNA uracil levels and chromosome breaks in humans are reversed by folate administration [18]. Folate supplementation above the RDA minimized chromosome breakage in an Australian study [23].

Folate deficiency has been associated with increased risk of colon cancer [24,25], and the 15 year use of a multivitamin supplement containing folate lowered colon cancer risk by about 75% [26]. Folate and B12 deficiencies are associated with cognitive defects in humans [18] and neurotoxicity in children is caused by methotrexate, which lowers folate pools if folate is not replenished [27]. Chromosome breaks could contribute to the increased risk of cancer, and possibly cognitive defects, associated with folate deficiency in humans [18].

Folate deficiency causes increased homocysteine accumulation, which has been associated with neural tube defects in the fetus and an estimated 10% of US heart disease, both of which could be eliminated by folate supplements, food fortification, or better diets [28–34]. Homocysteine damages endothelial cells in culture and is a risk factor for arterial endothelial dysfunction in humans [35].

A polymorphism (a common, alternate, form of a gene) in the gene for methylene-tetrahydrofolate (THF) reductase, the enzyme responsible for reducing methylene-THF to methyl-THF, results in homozygotes having a decreased activity and a two-fold increase in plasma homocysteine.

Homozygotes, 5–25% of individuals depending on the ethnicity [36,37], have an increased risk of heart disease [31], stroke [29,38], and neural tube defects [37,39]. This polymorphism increases the methylene-THF pool at the expense of the methyl-THF pool, resulting in decreased DNA uracil levels and increased serum homocysteine.

The potential role in human carcinogenesis of uracil misincorporation is supported by two studies which show a two- to four-fold lower risk of colon cancer for individuals who are homozygous for the mutant alleles of methylene-THF reductase compared to controls [33,40]. Acute lymphocytic leukemia has been associated with the polymorphism which suggests folate deficiency as a major cause [41,42].

Folates were measured in seminal plasma from smokers and nonsmokers, and evaluated relationships between seminal plasma folates and both folate status and semen quality measures [43]. Total seminal plasma folate concentrations were higher than blood plasma folate. Total and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate concentrations correlated significantly with blood plasma folate and homocysteine concentrations. Seminal plasma non-methyltetrahydrofolates correlated significantly with sperm density and total sperm count suggesting importance for male reproductive function, and a likely mechanism of DNA damage as uracil incorporation into sperm DNA.

4. Vitamin B12
The main dietary source of B12 is meat. About 4% of the US population consumes below half of the RDA of Vitamin B12 [5]. About 14% of elderly Americans and about 24% of elderly Dutch have mild B12 deficiency, in part accountable by the Americans taking more vitamin supplements [44].

Vitamin B12 would be expected to cause chromosome breaks by the same mechanism as folate deficiency. Both B12 and methyl-THF are required for the methylation of homocysteine to methionine. If either folate or B12 is deficient, then homocysteine, a major risk factor for heart disease [29,30], accumulates.

When B12 is deficient, then tetrahydrofolate is trapped as methyl-THF; the methylene-THF pool, which is required for methylation of dUMP to dTMP, is consequently diminished. Therefore, B12 deficiency, like folate deficiency, should cause uracil to accumulate in DNA, and there is accumulating evidence for this (Ingersoll et al., unpublished; [45]). The two deficiencies may act synergistically.

In a study of healthy Australian elderly men [23], or young adults [46], increased chromosome breakage was associated with either low intakes of folate, or B12, or with elevated levels of homocysteine [47]. The B12 supplementation above the RDA was necessary to minimize chromosome breakage [46,47]. The B12 deficiency is known to cause neuropathy due to demyelination and loss of peripheral neurons (reviewed in [18]).

(B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 11)

5. Vitamin B6
About 10% of the US population consumes less than half of the RDA (1.6 mg/day) of Vitamin B6 [5]. Vitamin B6 deficiency causes a decrease in the enzyme activity of serine hydroxymethyl transferase, the only source of the methylene group for methylene-THF [48]. If the methylene-THF pool is decreased in B6-deficiency, then uracil incorporation, with associated chromosome breaks, would be expected, and evidence for this has been found in women at a level of 32 nmol/l of Vitamin B6 in blood (0.5 mg/day intake) that were part of a previous intervention study ([49]; Ingersoll et al., unpublished).

In a case-control study of diet and cancer, Vitamin B6 intake was inversely associated with prostate cancer [50]. Vitamin B6 deficiency appears to contribute to heart disease and supplementation reduces risk [51]; levels above the RDA may be necessary to minimize risk [32].

A level of Vitamin B6 in blood below 23 nmol/l is a risk factor for stroke and atherosclerosis [52]. Diets low in Vitamin B6 are associated with brain dysfunction in children and adults [53]. Good sources of Vitamin B6 are whole grain bread and cereal, liver, bananas and green beans. A major source in the US is fortified breakfast cereal and multivitamins.

6. Vitamin C
About 15% of the population consumes less than half the RDA (60 mg/day) of ascorbate [5] which comes from dietary fruits and vegetables. The new RDAs for Vitamin C (90 mg/day for men, 75 mg/day for women and >35 mg for smokers) will make this percentage even higher.

There is a large literature on supplementation studies with Vitamin C in humans using biomarkers of oxidative damage to DNA, lipids (lipid oxidation releases mutagenic aldehydes), and protein. Though there are positive and negative studies, if the fact that the blood cell saturation occurs at about 100 mg/day [54,55] is taken into consideration, then the evidence suggests that this level minimizes DNA damage [56–59].

Cataracts appear to be due to oxidation of lens protein, and antioxidants, such as Vitamin C and E and carotenoids, appear to protect against cataracts and macular degeneration of the eye in rodents and humans [60–62]. The use of Vitamin C supplements for 10 years or more reduced lens opacities by about 80% [63].

Spontaneous oxidative damage in the DNA of an old rat is about 66,000 adducts per diploid cell [64,65], and unlike uracil misincorporation, is likely to be equally frequent on both strands. Glycosylase repair of oxidative adducts also results in transient single-strand breaks in DNA.

Therefore, increased oxidative damage from low Vitamin C intake, chronic inflammation, smoking, or radiation, together with elevated levels of uracil in DNA, would be expected to lead to more double-strand (chromosome) breaks in individuals who are deficient in both folate and antioxidants. There is some evidence for this synergy [66–68], which may be important because 10–15% of men in the US had serum ascorbate levels close to the scurvy threshold [5,69].

Some studies suggest that Vitamin C protects against cancer, which would be plausible based on the mechanistic data, though other studies show no effect, the variability of tissue saturation again is critical. A significant protective effect was observed for renal cancer in non-smokers, though not in smokers [70].

In a review of nutrition and pancreatic cancer, fruit and vegetable intake and Vitamin C were protective, though it is difficult to rule out that Vitamin C is a surrogate for some other compounds in fruits and vegetables [71].

Both experimental and epidemiological data suggest that Vitamin C protects against stomach cancer [72], a result that is plausible because of the role of oxidative damage from inflammation by Helicobacter pylori infection, which is the main risk factor for stomach cancer. The role of Vitamin C in inhibiting oral cancer has recently been reviewed [73].

Vitamin C improves endothelial dysfunction, an early stage of atherosclerosis, in heavy smokers [74]. Vitamin C supplementation was associated with a reduction in overall mortality and in cardiovascular disease in a follow up of the NHANES I study [75].

The effect of smoking on blood plasma antioxidant status was investigated by measuring ascorbic acid, a-tocopherol, g-tocopherol, b-carotene and lycopene and, subsequently, tested the effect of a 3-month dietary supplementation with a moderate dose vitamin cocktail [76]. Only ascorbic acid was significantly depleted by smoking per se (P < 0:01). Following the 3-month supplementation period, ascorbic acid was efficiently repleted in smokers (P < 0:001). Plasma a-tocopherol and the ratio of a- to g-tocopherol increased significantly in both supplemented groups (P <0:05).

(12 B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20)

The data suggests that previous reports of lower levels of plasma Vitamin E and carotenoids in smokers compared to non-smokers may primarily have been caused by differences in dietary habits between study groups. Plasma ascorbic acid is thus depleted by smoking and repleted by moderate supplementation.

Men with low consumption of antioxidants, or who smoke, oxidize the DNA of their sperm as well as their somatic DNA. When the level of dietary Vitamin C is insufficient to maintain seminal fluid Vitamin C, the oxidative lesions in sperm DNA are more than doubled [57,77]. Oxidative lesions in sperm DNA are higher in smokers than non-smokers [78].

Smoking is a severe oxidative stress, and the nitrogen oxides (NOx ) in cigarette smoke depletes antioxidants [76,79]. Thus, smokers must ingest much more Vitamin C than non-smokers to achieve the same level in

blood, but they rarely do. Inadequate Vitamin C levels are more common among the poor and smokers. Smokers also have more chromosomal abnormalities in their sperm than non-smokers [80].

Germ line mutations, and their associated cancer and genetic abnormalities, are predominately of paternal origin [81]. Smoking by fathers, therefore, may plausibly increase the risk of childhood cancer and birth defects, a thesis supported by epidemiological evidence [77,79].

The evidence on smoking fathers’ offspring having an increased rate of childhood cancer is becoming more persuasive [82–85]. A new epidemiological study from China makes the case stronger; acute lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, and brain cancer are each increased three- to four-fold in offspring of male smokers [82].

The studies on paternal smoking and childhood cancer did not examine the effect of diet. It seems likely, given the above evidence, that the cancer risk to offspring of male smokers would be higher when dietary antioxidant intake is low. Maternal use of multivitamins lowers the risk of childhood cancer in offspring [86].

In one study, the maternal use of vitamins throughout the pregnancy lowered the risk of brain tumors in the offspring by about half [87]. In a study of children with childhood cancer, serum levels of b-carotene, Vitamin E, and zinc were significantly lower than controls [88]. Thus, a multivitamin supplement (or a better diet) for both parents might markedly lower childhood cancer. In addition, several studies suggest an increased rate of birth defects in offspring of smoking fathers (reviewed in [77,79]).

Diets deficient in fruits and vegetables are commonly low in folate, antioxidants, (e.g. Vitamin C) and many other micronutrients, and it seems plausible that the higher cancer rates associated with consuming de- ficient diets are due, in good part, to increased DNA damage [8,18,89].

7. Vitamin E
Vitamin E, the major fat-soluble antioxidant, is consumed primarily from dietary vegetable oils and nuts. The RDA is 10 mg/day for men and 8 mg/day for women. About 20% of the population consumes less than half of the RDA [5]. Evidence is accumulating that the optimum intake may be higher, as discussed below.

Studies on Vitamin E supplementation have all been done with a-tocopherol, but g-tocopherol, the main form in the US diet, has a different function than a-tocopherol, and the two complement each other [90]. g-Tocopherol is a powerful nucleophile, and thus, traps electrophilic mutagens that reach the membrane.

In the soluble part of the cell, glutathione acts as both an antioxidant and a nucleophile. In the membrane, a-tocopherol is the antioxidant and g-tocopherol (or lycopene) can act as a nucleophile. An important electrophilic mutagen destroyed by g-tocopherol is NOx . g-Tocopherol reacts with NOx to form nitro-g-tocopherol, thus, protecting lipids, DNA, and protein [90–92]. g-Tocopherol is also an anti-inflammatory agent [93].

People taking Vitamin E supplements (200 IU/day) appear to lower their risk for colon cancer [94,95] and evidence suggests a marked protective effect of a supplement (50 IU/day) on prostate cancer [96,97]. Vitamin E appears to protect against brain dysfunction [98,99] and deficiency leads to various neuropathologies [100].

Vitamin E supplements (100–400 IU), also reduced the risk of coronary heart disease by about 40% [101–106] as well as mortality from all causes [103]. The role of oxidants and the protective role of antioxidants in heart disease have recently been reviewed [107,108]. Vitamin E is regenerated by Vitamin C.

In a study of a population with low levels of Vitamin C and E, (B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 13) doses of Vitamin E from 70 to 560 IU lowered lipid peroxidation while a very high dose appeared to increase it [109] emphasizing that information on the toxic level, as well as the optimum level, of each micronutrient is desirable.

Both Vitamin E and selenium enhance the immune system in animals [110], and Vitamin E supplementation (200–400 units/day) enhances human immunity [111]. Vitamin E [112] or Vitamin C [113] reduced oxidative stress and malformations in offspring of diabetic rats.

8. Selenium
Selenium is important in enzymatic defenses against oxidants, and deficiency would be expected to lead to oxidative DNA damage [114]. An RDA of 70 mg/day of selenium and an upper limit of 350mg/day has been proposed [115]. The average intake in the US is about 100mg/day, though different areas of the country have different selenium levels in the soil, and the bioavailability depends on the selenium form in foods [114].

A growing body of evidence suggests that selenium plays an important role in the prevention of cancer in a variety of organs and species [116,117]. Prostate cancer incidence was reduced by two/thirds in the selenium supplemented group (200 mg/day) compared to the placebo group in a randomized, double-blind, cancer prevention trial; total cancer mortality, lung and colorectal cancer were also significantly reduced [118,119].

In a cohort study [120], men in the highest selenium quintile of intake had only 1/2 the odds ratio of prostate cancer as men in the lowest quintile. In a nested, case-control prospective study on ovarian cancer, serum selenium was associated with decreased risk [121].

In a study of post-menopausal breast cancer patients, a strong inverse relationship was observed between triiodothyronine (T3) levels and cancer (OR D 0:17; CI (95%/ D 0:08–0.36) between the highest and lowest tertiles [122]. Toenail selenium was positively associated with T3 levels in both cases and controls; the selenoenzyme iodothyronine deiodinase synthesizes T3. Prostate and breast cancer cells were about 25 times more sensitive than normal cells to selenomethionine, a major form of selenium in cells [123].

In a study of selenium intake and colorectal cancer that adjusted for possible confounders, the individuals in the lowest quartile of plasma selenium had four times the risk of colorectal adenomas compared to those in the highest quartile [124]. Selenium and glutathione peroxidase levels were found to be lowered in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma [125].

In a Chinese study, cervical cancer mortality was inversely associated with several factors, including serum selenium levels [126]. Selenoprotein-P level was inversely associated with several types of cancer [127]. Selenium deficiency causes human cells in culture to be more sensitive to two mutagens causing single strand breaks in DNA [128].

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the protection against carcinogenesis by supplemental selenium [114]. One of these is its protection against oxidative damage involving selenium as an essential component of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase [129], or selenoprotein-P [130–132].

A recent review discusses the 11 selenoproteins and selenium’s role in preventing disease [133]. Excess selenium intake appears to cause oxidative damage and cancer in rodents [134]. The case for selenium supplementation is becoming stronger, though the toxicity of high selenium levels must be taken into account.

9. Niacin
The main dietary sources of niacin include meat and beans. About 2.3% of the US population consumes less than half the RDA of niacin [5]. Tryptophan from protein can also provide niacin equivalents [135]. About 15% of some populations have been reported to be severely deficient [136]. Niacin contributes to the repair of DNA-breaks by maintaining nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide levels for the poly-ADP ribose protective response to DNA damage [137–139]; deficiency compromises repair of DNA nicks and breaks, and thus, is expected to act synergistically with folate and antioxidant deficiencies in causing DNA damage and cancer [140].

10. Iron
A major dietary source of iron is meat. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has estimated that the world has about two billion people 14 B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 at risk for iron deficiency, mainly women and children. In the US, about 19% of women, aged 12–50, and about 7% of the population, ingest below 50% of the RDA [5]; about nine million people have been estimated to be clinically deficient [141].

Iron deficiency, or iron excess, leads to oxidative DNA damage [142,143]. Iron deficiency in children is associated with cognitive dysfunction [144,145]. Low iron intake results in anemia, immune dysfunction, and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as prematurity [145]. Excess iron appears to also lead to oxidative DNA damage in rats that is reversed by Vitamin E [146]. Increased risk of human cancer [145,147] and possibly heart disease [148–150] is associated with excess iron.

11. Zinc
Major sources of zinc are meat, eggs, nuts, and whole grains. Zinc deficiency causes a variety of health effects which have been reviewed in depth [151]. About 18% of the US population consumes less than half the RDA for zinc (12 mg women, 15 mg men) [5]. Mean daily intakes reported for poor children (5 mg), middle income children (6.3 mg) and vegetarians (6.4 mg) in the US appear insufficient [151].

Zinc is a component of over 300 proteins, over 100 DNA-binding proteins with zinc fingers, Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, the estrogen receptor, and synaptic transmission protein [151]. Functioning of p53, a zinc protein which is mutated in half of human tumors, is disrupted on loss of zinc [152]. Mutation is being prevented by p53, which inhibits cell division and induces apoptosis in response to DNA lesions [153].

Chromosome breaks in rats have been reported with a zinc deficient diet [154]. The offspring of zinc deficient rhesus monkeys also have increased chromosome breaks [155]. The chromosome breaks might be due to increased oxidative damage [155,156], perhaps due to loss of activity of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase or the zinc-containing DNA-repair enzyme, Fapy glycosylase, which repairs oxidized guanine [157].

Zinc deficiency has been suggested as a contributor to esophageal cancer in humans, and has been shown to cause esophageal tumors in rats in conjunction with a single low dose of a nitrosamine [158–160]. Severe zinc deficiency by itself can cause esophageal tumors in rats [160].

Zinc is known to be an essential trace element for testicular development and spermatogenesis [161]. Zinc concentrations in seminal plasma are hundreds of times greater than that in blood plasma, which suggests a specific function for this trace element in spermatogenesis and stability of spermatozoa [151].

Zinc concentrations are correlated positively with sperm cell density, and lower zinc concentrations are found in infertile men compared with fertile men [162]. Zinc deficiency leads to increased oxidative damage to testicular cell DNA (as measured by oxo8dG) and increased protein carbonyl content [163].

A considerable literature in experimental animals and humans suggests that zinc deficiency slows growth and development of the neonate. Severe deficiency in animals is teratogenic [155].

In a pair-matched, double-blind, study in Chile of preschool boys of low socio-economic status, those supplemented with 10 mg zinc/day grew significantly more rapidly than the placebo group [164]. This is consistent with earlier reports in the US and other countries on growth stimulation of poor children supplemented with zinc [151].

Zinc deficiency leads to alterations in brain development and growth [144]. Zinc deficiency in pregnant rats, at a level that does not impair the pregnancy or the growth of the pups, impairs cognitive function in adult offspring [151]. Zinc deficiency in adult rats impairs hippocampal and behavioral functions [151].

Several studies on monkeys show that maternal zinc deficiency leads to learning and behavioral disabilities in offspring [151]. Six studies in humans suggest that zinc deficiency leads to cognitive defects [151]. Several animal and human studies indicate that mild zinc deficiency impairs the immune system [151,165].

The incidence of respiratory infections in a group of institutionalized elderly was decreased by over two-fold (P _ 0:01) when they were given a supplement of zinc (20 mg) plus selenium (100 mg) in a double-blind placebo study; in other studies very high doses of zinc (100–150 mg/day) had an adverse effect on the immune system [166].

12. Conclusion
Optimizing micronutrient intake (through better diets, fortification of foods, or multivitamin-mineral pills [167]) can have a major impact on public health at low cost. (B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 15) Other micronutrients are likely to be added to the list of those whose deficiency causes DNA damage in the coming years. Tuning-up human metabolism, which varies with genetic constitution and changes with age, is likely to be a major way to minimize DNA damage, improve health and prolong healthy lifespan.

Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Foundation for Cancer Research Grant M2661, National Institutes of Health Grant AG17140, US. Department of Energy Grant DE-FG03-00ER62943, Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program Grant 7RT-0178, Wheeler Fund for the Biological Sciences at the University of California Berkeley, the Ellison Medical Foundation Grant SS-042-99 and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center Grant ESO1896.

 

References:

  1. P. Saltman, J. Gurin, I. Mothner, Nutrition Book, The University of California, San Diego, Little Brown & Company, Boston, 1993.
  2. Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes: Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride, Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1997.
  3. Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline, Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1998.
  4. National Research Council, Recommended Dietary Allowances, Subcommittee on the Tenth Edition of the RDAs, Food and Nutrition Board, Commission on Life Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1989.
  5. J.W. Wilson, C.W. Enns, J.D. Goldman, K.S. Tippett, S.J. Mickle, L.E. Cleveland, P.S. Chahil, Data Tables: Combined Results from USDA’s 1994 and 1995 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes By Individuals and 1994 and 1995 Diet and Health Knowledge Survey, USDA/ARS Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Riverdale, MD, 1997.
  6. S. Bonassi, L. Hagmar, U. Strömberg, A.H. Montagud, H. Tinnerberg, A. Forni, P. Heikkilä, S. Wanders, P. Wilhardt, I.-L. Hansteen, L.E. Knudsen, H. Norppa, Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer independently of exposure to carcinogens. European study group on cytogenetic biomarkers and health, Cancer Res. 60 (2000) 1619–1625.
  7. B.N. Ames, M.K. Shigenaga, T.M. Hagen, Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (1993) 7915–7922.
  8. G. Block, B. Patterson, A. Subar, Fruit, vegetables and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiologic evidence, Nutr. Cancer 18 (1992) 1–29.
  9. K.A. Steinmetz, J.D. Potter, Vegetables, fruit and cancer prevention: a review, J. Am. Diet Assoc. 96 (1996) 1027–1039.
  10. W.C. Willett, D. Trichopoulos, Nutrition and cancer: a summary of the evidence, Cancer Causes Control 7 (1996) 178–180.
  11. P.K. Mills, W.L. Beeson, R.L. Phillips, G.E. Fraser, Cancer incidence among California Seventh-day Adventists, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 59 (Suppl.) (1994) 1136S–1142S.
  12. S.M. Krebs-Smith, A. Cook, A.F. Subar, L. Cleveland, J. Friday, L.L. Kahle, Fruit and vegetable intakes of children and adolescents in the United States, Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 150 (1996) 81–86.
  13. S.M. Krebs-Smith, A. Cook, A.F. Subar, L. Cleveland, J. Friday, US adults’ fruit and vegetable intakes, 1989–1991: a revised baseline for the healthy people 2000 objective, Am. J. Public Health 85 (1995) 1623–1629.
  14. B.N. Ames, L.S. Gold, Environmental pollution, pesticides, and the prevention of cancer: misconceptions, FASEB J. 11 (1997) 1041–1052.
  15. National Cancer Institute Graphic, Why eat five? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88 (1996) 1314.
  16. S. Krebs-Smith, J. Heimendinger, B. Patterson, A. Subar, R. Kessler, E. Pivonka, Psychosocial factors associated with fruit and vegetables consumption, Am. J. Health Promot. 10 (1995) 98–104.
  17. B.M. Popkin, A.M. Siega-Riz, P.S. Haines, Correction and revision of conclusions — dietary trends in the United States, N. Engl. J. Med. 337 (1997) 1846–1848.
  18. B.C. Blount, M.M. Mack, C. Wehr, J. MacGregor, R. Hiatt, G. Wang, S.N. Wickramasinghe, R.B. Everson, B.N. Ames, Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (1997) 3290–3295.
  19. F.R. Senti, S.M. Pilch, Analysis of folate data from the second national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES II), J. Nutr. 115 (1985) 1398–1402.
  20. A.F. Subar, G. Block, L.D. James, Folate intake and food sources in the US population, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50 (1989) 508–516.
  21. L.B. Bailey, P.A. Wagner, G.J. Christakis, P.E. Araujo, H. Appledorf, C.G. Davis, J. Masteryanni, J.S. Dinning, Folacin and iron status and hematological findings in predominately black elderly persons from urban low-income households, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32 (1979) 2346–2353.
  22. L.B. Bailey, P.A. Wagner, G.J. Christakis, C.G. Davis, H. Appledorf, P.E. Araujo, E. Dorsey, J.S. Dinning, Folacin and iron status and hematological findings in black and Spanish–American adolescents from urban low-income households, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 35 (1982) 1023–1032. 16 B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20.
  23. M.F. Fenech, I.E. Dreosti, J.R. Rinaldi, Folate, Vitamin B12, homocysteine status and chromosome damage rate in lymphocytes of older men, Carcinogenesis 18 (1997) 1329–1336.
  24. E. Giovannucci, M.J. Stampfer, G.A. Colditz, E.B. Rimm, D. Trichopoulos, B.A. Rosner, F.E. Speizer, W.C. Willett, Folate, methionine, and alcohol intake and risk of colorectal adenoma, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85 (1993) 875–884.
  25. J.B. Mason, Folate and colonic carcinogenesis: searching for a mechanistic understanding, J. Nutr. Biochem. 5 (1994) 170–175.
  26. E. Giovannucci, M.J. Stampfer, G.A. Colditz, D.J. Hunger, C. Fuchs, B.A. Rosner, F.E. Speizer, W.C. Willett, Multivitamin use, folate, and colon cancer in women in the nurses’ health study, Ann. Int. Med. 129 (1998) 517–524.
  27. C.T. Quinn, J.C. Griener, T. Bottiglieri, K. Hyland, A. Farrow, B.A. Kamen, Elevation of homocysteine and excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters in the CSF of children who receive methotrexate for the treatment of cancer, J. Clin. Oncol. 15 (1997) 2800–2806.
  28. S.A.A. Beresford, C.J. Boushey, Homocysteine, folic acid, and cardiovascular disease risk, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 1997, pp. 193–224.
  29. C.J. Boushey, S.A. Beresford, G.S. Omenn, A.G. Motulsky, A quantitative assessment of plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease. Probable benefits of increasing folic acid intakes, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 274 (1995) 1049–1057.
  30. G.P. Oakley Jr., M.J. Adams, C.M. Dickinson, More folic acid for everyone, now, J. Nutr. 126 (1996) 751S–755S.
  31. H. Refsum, P.M. Ueland, O. Nygård, S.E. Vollset, Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease, Ann. Rev. Med. 49 (1998) 31–62.
  32. E.B. Rimm, W.C. Willett, F.B. Hu, L. Sampson, G.A. Colditz, J.E. Manson, C. Hennekens, M.J. Stampfer, Folate and Vitamin B6 from diet and supplements in relation to risk of coronary heart disease among women, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 279 (1998) 359–364.
  33. K.L. Tucker, B. Mahnken, P.W. Wilson, P. Jacques, J. Selhub, Folic acid fortification of the food supply: potential benefits and risks for the elderly population, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 276 (1996) 1879–1885.
  34. M.J. Stampfer, F.B. Hu, J.E. Manson, E.B. Rimm, W.C. Willett, Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle, N. Engl. J. Med. 343 (2000) 16–22.
  35. K.S. Woo, P. Chook, Y.I. Lolin, A.S.P. Cheung, L.T. Chan, Y.Y. Sun, J.E. Sanderson, C. Metreweli, D.S. Celermajer, Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia is a risk factor for arterial endothelial dysfunction in humans, Circulation 96 (1997) 2542–2544.
  36. P. Frosst, H.J. Blom, R. Milos, P. Goyette, C.A. Sheppard, R.G. Matthews, G.J. Boers, M. den Heijer, L.A. Kluijtmans, L.P. van den Heuvel, R. Rozen, A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (letter), Nat. Genet. 10 (1995) 111–113.
  37. A.S. Whitehead, P. Gallagher, J.L. Mills, P.N. Kirke, H. Burke, A.M. Molloy, D.G. Weir, D.C. Shields, J.M. Scott, A genetic defect in 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in neural tube defects, QJM 88 (1995) 763–766.
  38. H.I. Morrison, D. Schaubel, M. Desmeules, D.T. Wigle, Serum folate and risk of fatal coronary heart disease (see comments), J. Am. Med. Assoc. 275 (1996) 1893–1896.
  39. D.L. Posey, M.J. Koury, J. Mulinare, M.J. Adams Jr., C.Y. Ou, Is mutated MTHFR a risk factor for neural tube defects? Lancet 347 (1996) 686–687.
  40. J. Chen, E. Giovannucci, K. Kelsey, E.B. Rimm, M.J. Stampfer, G.A. Colditz, D. Spiegelmen, W.C. Willett, D.J. Hunter, A methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer, Cancer Res. 56 (1996) 4862–4864.
  41. C.F. Skibola, M.T. Smith, E. Kane, E. Roman, S. Rollinson, R.A. Cartwright, G. Morgan, Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (1999).
  42. B.N. Ames, Cancer prevention and diet: help from single nucleotide polymorphisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (1999) 12216–12218.
  43. L.M. Wallock, T. Tamura, C.A. Mayr, K.E. Johnston, B.N. Ames, R.A. Jacob, Low seminal plasma folate is associated with low sperm density and number in smoking and nonsmoking men, Fertil. Steril. 75 (2001) 252–259.
  44. D.Z. van Asselt, L.C. de Groot, W.A. van Staveren, H.J. Blom, R.A. Wevers, I. Biemond, W.H. Hoefnagels, Role of cobalamin intake and atrophic gastritis in mild cobalamin deficiency in older Dutch subjects, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68 (1998) 328–334.
  45. S.N. Wickramasinghe, S. Fida, Bone marrow cells from Vitamin B12- and folate-deficient patients misincorporate uracil into DNA, Blood 83 (1994) 1656–1661.
  46. M. Fenech, C. Aitken, J. Rinaldi, Folate, Vitamin B12, homocysteine status and DNA damage in young Australian adults, Carcinogenesis 19 (1998) 1163–1171.
  47. M. Fenech, Micronucleus frequency in human lymphocytes is related to plasma Vitamin B12 and homocysteine, Mut. Res. 428 (1999) 299–304.
  48. S.P. Stabler, D.A. Sampson, L.P. Wang, R.H. Allen, Elevations of serum cystathionine and total homocysteine in pyridoxine-, folate-, and cobalamin-deficient rats, J. Nutr. Biochem. 8 (1997) 279–289.
  49. Y.C. Huang, W. Chen, M.A. Evans, M.E. Mitchell, T.D. Shultz, Vitamin B6 requirement and status assessment of young women fed a high-protein diet with various levels of Vitamin B6, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 67 (1998) 208–220.
  50. T.J. Key, P.B. Silcocks, G.K. Davey, P.N. Appleby, D.T. Bishop, A case-control study of diet and prostate cancer, Br. J. Cancer 76 (1997) 678–687.
  51. E. Rimm, W. Willett, J. Manson, F. Speizer, C. Hennekens, M. Stampfer, Folate and Vitamin B6 intake and risk of myocardial infarction among US women (abstract), Am. J. Epidemiol. 143 (Suppl.) (1996) S36. B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 17.
  52. K. Robinson, K. Arheart, H. Refsum, L. Brattstrom, G. Boers, P. Ueland, P. Rubba, R. Palma-Reis, R. Meleady, L. Daly, J. Witteman, I. Graham, Low circulating folate and Vitamin B6 concentrations: risk factors for stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and coronary artery disease. European COMAC Group (see comments), Circulation 97 (1998) 437–443.
  53. J.E. Leklem, Vitamin B6, in: E.E. Ziegler, L.J. Filer Jr. (Eds.), Present Knowledge in Nutrition, ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 174–183.
  54. A. Kallner, D. Hartmann, D. Hornig, Steady-state turnover and body pool of ascorbic acid in man, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32 (1979) 530–539.
  55. M. Levine, C. Conry-Cantilena, Y. Wang, R.W. Welch, P.W. Washko, K.R. Dhariwal, J.B. Park, A. Lazarev, J.F. Graumlich, J. King, L.R. Cantilena, Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: evidence for a recommended dietary allowance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 3704–3709.
  56. S.J. Duthie, A. Ma, M.A. Ross, A.R. Collins, Antioxidant supplementation decreases oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes, Cancer Res. 56 (1996) 1291–1295.
  57. C.G. Fraga, P.A. Motchnik, M.K. Shigenaga, H.J. Helbock, R.A. Jacob, B.N. Ames, Ascorbic acid protects against endogenous oxidative damage in human sperm, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88 (1991) 11003–11006.
  58. D. Harats, S. Chevion, M. Nahir, Y. Norman, O. Sagee, E.M. Berry, Citrus fruit supplementation reduces lipoprotein oxidation in young men ingesting a diet high in saturated fat: presumptive evidence for an interaction between Vitamins C and E in vivo, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 67 (1998) 240–245.
  59. M.R. McCall, B. Frei, Can antioxidant vitamins materially reduce oxidative damage in humans? Free Rad. Biol. Med. 26 (1999) 1034–1053.
  60. S.E. Hankinson, M.J. Stampfer, J.M. Seddon, G.A. Colditz, B. Rosner, F.E. Speizer, W.C. Willett, Nutrient intake and cataract extraction in women: a prospective study, Br. Med. J. 305 (1992) 335–339.
  61. S. Hung, J.M. Seddon, The relationship between nutritional factors and age-related macular degeneration, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 1997, pp. 245–265.
  62. A. Taylor, P.F. Jacques, Antioxidant status and risk for cataract, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 1997, pp. 267–283.
  63. P.F. Jacques, A. Taylor, S.E. Hankinson, W.C. Willett, B. Mahnken, Y. Lee, K. Vaid, M. Lahav, Long-term Vitamin C supplement use and prevalence of early age-related lens opacities, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66 (1997) 911–916.
  64. H.J. Helbock, K.B. Beckman, M.K. Shigenaga, P. Walter, A.A. Woodall, H.C. Yeo, B.N. Ames, DNA oxidation matters: the HPLC-EC assay of 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine and 8-oxo-guanine, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (1998) 288–293.
  65. K.B. Beckman, S. Saljoughi, S. Mashiyama, B.N. Ames, a simpler, more robust method for the analysis of 8-oxoguanine in DNA, Free Rad. Biol. Med. 3–4 (2000) 357–367.
  66. J.T. MacGregor, C.M. Wehr, R.A. Hiatt, B. Peters, J.D. Tucker, R. Langlois, R.A. Jacob, R.H. Jensen, J.W. Yager, M.K. Shigenaga, B. Frei, B.P. Eynon, B.N. Ames, Spontaneous genetic damage in man: evaluation of interindividual variability, relationship among markers of damage, and influence of nutritional status, Mut. Res. 377 (1997) 125–135.
  67. L. Wallock, A. Woodall, R. Jacob, B. Ames, Nutritional status and positive relation of plasma folate to fertility indices in nonsmoking men (abstract), FASEB J. 11 (1997) A184 –1068.
  68. R.F. Branda, D.B. Blickensderfer, Folate deficiency increases genetic damage caused by alkylating agents and gamma-irradiation in Chinese hamster ovary cells, Cancer Res. 53 (1993) 5401–5408.
  69. National Center for Health Statistics, Hematological and Nutritional Biochemistry Reference Data for Persons 6 Months–74 Years of Age: United States 1976–1980., Vital and Health Statistics, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1982.
  70. A. Wolk, P. Lindblad, H.-O. Adami, Nutrition and renal cell cancer, Cancer Causes Control 7 (1996) 5–18.
  71. G.R. Howe, J.D. Burch, Nutrition and pancreatic cancer, Cancer Causes Control 7 (1996) 69–82.
  72. S. Kono, T. Hirohata, Nutrition and stomach cancer, Cancer Causes Control 7 (1996) 41–55.
  73. S.W.Y. Chan, P.C. Reade, The role of ascorbic acid in oral cancer and carcinogenesis, Oral Dis. 4 (1998) 120–129.
  74. T. Heitzer, H. Just, T. Münzel, Antioxidant Vitamin C improves endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers, Circulation 94 (1996) 6–9.
  75. J.E. Enstrom, L.E. Kanim, M.A. Klein, Vitamin C intake and mortality among a sample of the United States population, Epidemiology 3 (1992) 194–202.
  76. J. Lykkesfeldt, S. Christen, L.M. Wallock, H.H. Chang, R.A. Jacob, B.N. Ames, Ascorbate is depleted by smoking and repleted by moderate supplementation: a study in male smokers and nonsmokers with matched dietary antioxidant intakes, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71 (2000) 530–536.
  77. B.N. Ames, P.A. Motchnik, C.G. Fraga, M.K. Shigenaga, T.M. Hagen, Antioxidant prevention of birth defects and cancer, in: D.R. Mattison, A. Olshan (Eds.), Male-Mediated Developmental Toxicity, Plenum Press, New York, 1994, pp. 243–259.
  78. C.G. Fraga, P.A. Motchnik, A.J. Wyrobek, D.M. Rempel, B.N. Ames, Smoking and low antioxidant levels increase oxidative damage to sperm DNA, Mut. Res. 351 (1996) 199–203.
  79. C.A. Mayr, A.A. Woodall, B.N. Ames, DNA damage to sperm from micronutrient deficiency may increase the risk of birth defects and cancer in offspring, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 2000, pp. 373–386. 18 B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20.
  80. A.J. Wyrobek, J. Rubes, M. Cassel, D. Moore, S. Perrault, V. Slott, D. Evenson, Z. Zudova, L. Borkovec, S. Selevan, X. Lowe, Smokers produce more aneuploid sperm than non-smokers, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57 (1995) 737.
  81. J. Crow, How much do we know about spontaneous human mutation rates? Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 21 (1993) 122–129.
  82. B.-T. Ji, X.-O. Shu, M.S. Linet, W. Zheng, S. Wacholder, Y.- T. Gao, D.-M. Ying, F. Jin, Paternal cigarette smoking and the risk of childhood cancer among offspring of non-smoking mothers, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89 (1997) 238–244.
  83. T. Sorahan, R.J. Lancashire, P. Prior, I. Peck, A.M. Stewart, Childhood cancer and parental use of alcohol and tobacco, Ann. Epidemiol. 5 (1995) 354–359.
  84. T. Sorahan, R.J. Lancashire, M.A. Hulten, I. Peck, A.M. Stewart, Childhood cancer and parental use of tobacco: deaths from 1953 to 1955, Br. J. Cancer 75 (1997) 134–138.
  85. T. Sorahan, P. Prior, R.J. Lancashire, S.P. Faux, M.A. Hulten, I. Peck, A.M. Stewart, Childhood cancer and parental use of tobacco: deaths from 1971 to 1976, Br. J. Cancer 76 (1997) 1525–1531.
  86. G.R. Bunin, J.M. Cary, Diet and childhood cancer, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 1997, pp. 17–32.
  87. S. Preston-Martin, J.M. Pogoda, B.A. Mueller, E.A. Holly, W. Lijinsky, R.L. Davis, Maternal consumption of cured meats and vitamins in relation to pediatric brain tumors, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 5 (1996) 599–605.
  88. D.J. Malvy, J. Arnaud, B. Burtschy, D. Sommelet, G. Leverger, L. Dostalova, O. Amedee-Manesme, Antioxidant micronutrients and childhood malignancy during oncological treatment, Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 29 (1997) 213–217.
  89. B.N. Ames, L.S. Gold, W.C. Willett, The causes and prevention of cancer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 5258–5265.
  90. S. Christen, A.A. Woodall, M.K. Shigenaga, P.T. Southwell-Keely, M.W. Duncan, B.N. Ames, g-Tocopherol traps mutagenic electrophiles such as NOx and complements a-tocopherol: physiological implications, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (1997) 3217–3222.
  91. R.V. Cooney, P.J. Harwood, A.A. Franke, K. Narala, A.K. Sundstrom, P.-O. Berggren, L.J. Mordan, Products of gamma-tocopherol reaction with NO2 and their formation in rat insulinoma (RINm5F) cells, Free Rad. Biol. Med. 19 (1995) 259–269.
  92. M.K. Shigenaga, H. Lee, B. Blount, S. Christen, E.T. Shigeno, H. Yip, B.N. Ames, Inflammation and NOx – induced nitration: assay for 3-nitrotyrosine by HPLC with electrochemical detection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (1997) 3211–3216.
  93. Q. Jiang, I. Elson-Schwab, C. Courtemanche, B.N. Ames, g-Tocopherol and its major metabolite, in contrast to a-tocopherol, inhibit cyclooxgenase activity in macrophages and epithelial cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (2000) 11494–11499.
  94. E. White, J.S. Shannon, R.E. Patterson, Relationship between vitamin and calcium supplement use and colon cancer, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 6 (1997) 769–774.
  95. D. Albanes, N. Malila, P.R. Taylor, J.K. Huttunen, J. Virtamo, B.K. Edwards, M. Rautalahti, A.M. Hartman, M.J. Barrett, P. Pietinen, T.J. Hartman, P. Sipponen, K. Lewin, L. Teerenhovi, P. Hietanen, J.A. Tangrea, M. Virtanen, O.P. Heinonen, Effects of supplemental alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene on colorectal cancer: results from a controlled trial (Finland), Cancer Causes Control 11 (2000) 197–205.
  96. T.J. Hartman, D. Albanes, P. Pietinen, A.M. Hartman, M. Rautalahti, J.A. Tangrea, P.R. Taylor, The association between baseline Vitamin E, selenium, and prostate cancer in the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 7 (1998) 335–340.
  97. O.P. Heinonen, D. Albanes, J. Virtamo, P.R. Taylor, J.K. Huttunen, A.M. Hartman, J. Haapakoski, N. Malila, M. Rautalahti, S. Ripatti, H. Maenpaa, L. Teerenhovi, L. Koss, M. Virolainen, B.K. Edwards, Prostate cancer and supplementation with alpha-tocopherol and beta- carotene: incidence and mortality in a controlled trial (see comments), J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 90 (1998) 440–446.
  98. R. Lethem, M. Orrell, Antioxidants and dementia, Lancet 349 (1997) 1189–1189.
  99. M. Sano, C. Ernesto, R.G. Thomas, M.R. Klauber, K. Schafer, M. Grundman, P. Woodbury, J. Growdon, C.W. Cotman, E. Pfeiffer, L.S. Schneider, L.J. Thal, A controlled trial of selegiline, alpha-tocopherol, or both as treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s disease cooperative study, N. Engl. J. Med. 336 (1997) 1216–1222.
  100. R.J. Sokol, Vitamin E, in: E.E. Ziegler, L.J. Filer Jr. (Eds.), Present Knowledge in Nutrition, ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 130–136.
  101. J.E. Buring, J.M. Gaziano, Antioxidant vitamins and cardiovascular disease, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 1997, pp. 171–180.
  102. L.H. Kushi, A.R. Folsom, R.J. Prineas, P.J. Mink, Y. Wu, R.M. Bostick, Dietary antioxidant vitamins and death from coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women, N. Engl. J. Med. 334 (1996) 1156–1162.
  103. K.G. Losonczy, T.B. Harris, R.J. Havlik, Vitamin E and Vitamin C supplement use and risk of all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality in older persons: the established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64 (1996) 190–196.
  104. E.B. Rimm, M.J. Stampfer, A. Ascherio, E. Giovannucci, G.A. Colditz, W.C. Willett, Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease in men, N. Engl. J. Med. 328 (1993) 1450–1456.
  105. M.J. Stampfer, E.B. Rimm, Epidemiologic evidence for Vitamin E in prevention of cardiovascular disease, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 62 (Suppl.) (1995) 1365S–1369S.
  106. N.G. Stephens, A. Parsons, P.M. Schofield, F. Kelly, K. Cheeseman, M.J. Mitchinson, M.J. Brown, Randomised controlled trial of Vitamin E in patients with coronary disease: Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS), Lancet 347 (1996) 781–786. B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 19
  107. M.N. Diaz, B. Frei, J.A. Vita, J.F. Keaney Jr., Antioxidants and atherosclerotic heart disease, N. Engl. J. Med. 337 (1997) 408–416.
  108. A.T. Diplock, Commentary. Will the Good Fairies please prove to us that Vitamin E lessens human degenerative disease? Free Rad. Res. 27 (1997) 511–532.
  109. K.M. Brown, P.C. Morrice, G.G. Duthie, Erythrocyte Vitamin E and plasma ascorbate concentrations in relation to erythrocyte peroxidation in smoker and nonsmokers: dose response to Vitamin E supplementation, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65 (1997) 496–502.
  110. J.M. Finch, R.J. Turner, Effects of selenium and Vitamin E on the immune responses of domestic animals, Res. Vet. Sci. 60 (1996) 97–106.
  111. S.N. Meydani, M. Meydani, J.B. Blumberg, L.S. Leka, G. Siber, R. Loszewski, C. Thompson, M.C. Pedrosa, R.D. Diamond, B.D. Stollar, Vitamin E supplementation and in vivo immune response in healthy elderly subjects: a randomized controlled trial, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 277 (1997) 1380–1386.
  112. C.M. Simán, U.J. Eriksson, Vitamin E decreases the occurrence of malformations in the offspring of diabetic rats, Diabetes 46 (1997) 1054–1061.
  113. C.M. Simán, U.J. Eriksson, Vitamin C supplementation of the maternal diet reduces the rate of malformation in the offspring of diabetic rats, Diabetologia 40 (1997) 1416–1424.
  114. O.A. Levander, R.F. Burk, Selenium, in: E.E. Ziegler, L.J. Filer (Eds.), Present Knowledge in Nutrition, ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 320–328.
  115. O.A. Levander, P.D. Whanger, Deliberations and evaluations of the approaches, endpoints and paradigms for selenium and iodine dietary recommendations, J. Nutr. 126 (1996) 2427S–2434S.
  116. E. Giovannucci, Selenium and risk of prostate cancer, Lancet 352 (1998) 755–756.
  117. P.R. Harrison, J. Lanfear, L. Wu, J. Fleming, L. McGarry, L. Blower, Chemopreventive and growth inhibitory effects of selenium, Biomed. Environ. Sci. 10 (1997) 235–245.
  118. L.C. Clark, G.F. Combs Jr., B.W. Turnbull, E.H. Slate, D.K. Chalker, J. Chow, L.S. Davis, R.A. Glover, G.F. Graham, E.G. Gross, Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin: a randomized controlled trial, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 276 (1996) 1957–1963.
  119. L.C. Clark, B. Dalkin, A. Krongrad, G.F. Combs Jr., B.W. Turnbull, E.H. Slate, R. Witherington, J.H. Herlong, E. Janosko, D. Carpenter, C. Borosso, S. Falk, J. Rounder, Decreased incidence of prostate cancer with selenium supplementation: results of a double-blind cancer prevention trial, Br. J. Urol. 81 (1998) 730–734.
  120. K. Yoshizawa, W.C. Willett, S.J. Morris, M.J. Stampfer, D. Spiegelman, E.B. Rimm, E. Giovannucci, Study of prediagnostic selenium level in toenails and the risk of advanced prostate cancer, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 90 (1998) 1219–1224.
  121. K.J. Helzlsouer, A.J. Alberg, E.P. Norkus, J.S. Morris, S.C. Hoffman, G.W. Comstock, Prospective study of serum micronutrients and ovarian cancer, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88 (1996) 32–37.
  122. J.J. Strain, E. Bokje, P. van’t Veer, J. Coulter, C. Stewart, H. Logan, W. Odling-Smee, R.A. Spence, K. Steele, Thyroid hormones and selenium status in breast cancer, Nutr. Cancer 27 (1997) 48–52.
  123. C. Redman, J.A. Scott, A.T. Baines, J.L. Basye, L.C. Clark, C. Calley, D. Roe, C.M. Payne, M.A. Nelson, Inhibitory effect of selenomethionine on the growth of three selected human tumor cell lines, Cancer Lett. 125 (1998) 103–110.
  124. M.W. Russo, S.C. Murray, J.I. Wurzelmann, J.T. Woosley, R.S. Sandler, Plasma selenium levels and the risk of colorectal adenomas, Nutr. Cancer 28 (1997) 125–129.
  125. V. Bhuvarahamurthy, N. Balasubramanian, S. Govindasamy, Effect of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on circulating antioxidant system of human uterine cervical carcinoma, Mol. Cell Biochem. 158 (1996) 17–23.
  126. W.D. Guo, A.W. Hsing, J.Y. Li, J.S. Chen, W.H. Chow, W.J. Blot, Correlation of cervical cancer mortality with reproductive and dietary factors, and serum markers in China, Int. J. Epidemiol. 23 (1994) 1127–1132.
  127. M.E. Persson-Moschos, L. Stavenow, B. Akesson, F. Lindgarde, Selenoprotein P in plasma in relation to cancer morbidity in middle-aged Swedish men, Nutr. Cancer 36 (2000) 19–26.
  128. A.C. Huang, M.Y. Yeh, B.N. Ames, Increased sensitivity of two selenium deficient primary human cell lines to hydrogen peroxide and to N-methyl-N0-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine but not to UV radiation (abstract), Selenium 2000, in: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Selenium in Biology and Medicine, 1–5 October 2000, Venice, Italy, 2000.
  129. J.T. Rotruck, A.L. Pope, H.E. Ganther, A.B. Swanson, D.G. Hafeman, W.G. Hoekstra, Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase, Science 179 (1973) 588–590.
  130. R.F. Burk, R.A. Lawrence, J.M. Lane, Liver necrosis and lipid peroxidation in the rat as the result of paraquat and diquat administration. Effect of selenium deficiency, J. Clin. Invest. 65 (1980) 1024–1031.
  131. K.E. Hill, R.F. Burk, Selenoprotein P: recent studies in rats and in humans, Biomed. Environ. Sci. 10 (1997) 198–208.
  132. J.G. Yang, K.E. Hill, R.F. Burk, Dietary selenium intake controls rat plasma selenoprotein P concentration, J. Nutr. 119 (1989) 1010–1012.
  133. D.H. Holben, A.M. Smith, The diverse role of selenium within selenoproteins: a review, J. Am. Diet Assoc. 99 (1999) 836–843.
  134. L.S. Gold, T.H. Slone, B.N. Ames, Overview and update analyses of the carcinogenic potency database, in: L.S. Gold, E. Zeiger (Eds.), Handbook of Carcinogenic Potency and Genotoxicity Databases, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997, pp. 661–685.
  135. G.M. McCreanor, D.A. Bender, The metabolism of high intakes of tryptophan, icotinamide and nicotinic acid in the rat, Br. J. Nutr. 5 (1986) 577–586.
  136. E.L. Jacobson, Niacin deficiency and cancer in women, J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 12 (1993) 412–416. 20 B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20
  137. E.L. Jacobson, W.M. Shieh, A.C. Huang, Mapping the role of NAD metabolism in prevention and treatment of carcinogenesis, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 193 (1999) 69–74.
  138. J.M. Rawling, T.M. Jackson, E.R. Driscoll, J.B. Kirkland, Dietary niacin deficiency lowers tissue poly(ADP-ribose) and NADC concentrations in Fischer-344 rats, J. Nutr. 124 (1994) 1597–1603.
  139. J.Z. Zhang, S.M. Henning, M.E. Swendseid, Poly(ADPribose) polymerase activity and DNA strand breaks are affected in tissues of niacin-deficient rats, J. Nutr. 123 (1993) 1349–1355.
  140. S.M. Henning, M.E. Swendseid, W.F. Coulson, Male rats fed methyl- and folate-deficient diets with or without niacin develop hepatic carcinomas associated with decreased tissue NAD concentrations and altered poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity, J. Nutr. 127 (1997) 30–36.
  141. A.C. Looker, P.R. Dallman, M.D. Carroll, E.W. Gunter, C.L. Johnson, Prevalence of iron deficiency in the United States, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 277 (1997) 973–976.
  142. M.D. Knutson, P.B. Walter, B.N. Ames, F.E. Viteri, Both iron deficiency and daily iron supplements increase lipid peroxidation in rats, J. Nutr. 130 (2000) 621–628.
  143. P.B. Walter, M.D. Knutson, A. Paler-Martinez, S. Lee, Y. Xu, F.E. Viteri, B.N. Ames, Both iron deficiency and excess supplementation damage mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA, in preparation.
  144. J. Beard, Nutrient status and central nervous system function, in: E.E. Ziegler, L.J. Filer Jr. (Eds.), Present Knowledge in Nutrition, ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 612–622.
  145. R. Yip, P.R. Dallman, Iron, in: E.E. Ziegler, L.J. Filer Jr. (Eds.), Present Knowledge in Nutrition, ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 277–292.
  146. D. Zhang, S. Okada, Y.Y. Yu, P. Zheng, R. Yamaguchi, H. Kasai, Vitamin E inhibits apoptosis, DNA modification, and cancer incidence induced by iron-mediated peroxidation in Wistar rat kidney, Cancer Res. 57 (1997) 2410–2414.
  147. S. Toyokuni, Iron-induced carcinogenesis: the role of redox regulation, Free Rad. Biol. Med. 20 (1996) 553–566.
  148. C.T. Sempos, R.F. Gillum, A.C. Looker, Iron and heart disease, in: A. Bendich, R.J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals, Humanae Press, Totowa, NJ, 1997, pp. 181–192.
  149. T.-P. Tuomainen, K. Punnonen, K. Nyysslönen, J.T. Salonen, Association between body iron stores and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in men, Circulation 97 (1998) 1461–1466.
  150. D.G. Meyers, The iron hypothesis — does iron cause atherosclerosis? Clin. Cardiol. 19 (1996) 925–929.
  151. C.T. Walsh, H.H. Sandstead, A.S. Prasad, P.M. Newberne, P.J. Fraker, Zinc: health effects and research priorities for the 1990s, Environ. Health Perspect. 102 (Suppl. 2) (1994) 5–46.
  152. N.P. Pavletich, K.A. Chambers, C.O. Pabo, The DNA-binding domain of p53 contains the four conserved regions and the major mutation hot spots, Genes Dev. 7 (1993) 2556–2564.
  153. B. Sarkar, Metal replacement in DNA-binding zinc finger proteins and its relevance to mutagenicity and carcinogenicity through free radical generation, Nutrition 11 (1995) 646–649.
  154. C.E. Castro, L.C. Kaspin, S.-S. Chen, S.G. Nolker, Zinc deficiency increases the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks in rat liver, Nutr. Res. 12 (1992) 721–736.
  155. K.L. Olin, M.K. Shigenaga, B.N. Ames, M.S. Golub, M.E. Gershwin, A.G. Hendrickx, C.L. Keen, Maternal dietary zinc influences DNA strand break and 8-hydroxy- 20-deoxyguanosine levels in infant rhesus monkey liver, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 203 (1993) 461–466.
  156. P.L. Oteiza, K.L. Olin, C.E. Fraga, C.L. Keen, Oxidant defense systems in testes from zinc-deficient rats (44040), Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 213 (1996) 85–91.
  157. T.R. O’Connor, R.J. Graves, G. de Murcia, B. Castaing, J. Laval, Fpg protein of Escherichia coli is a zinc finger protein whose cysteine residues have a structural and/or functional role, J. Biol. Chem. 268 (1993) 9063–9070.
  158. L.Y.Y. Fong, J. Li, J.L. Farber, P.N. Magee, Cell proliferation and esophageal carcinogenesis in the zinc-deficient rat, Carcinogenesis 17 (1996) 1841–1848.
  159. L.Y.Y. Fong, K.-M. Lau, K. Huebner, P.N. Magee, Induction of esophageal tumors in zinc-deficient rats by single low doses of N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine (NMBA): analysis of cell proliferation, and mutations in H-ras and p53 genes, Carcinogenesis 18 (1997) 1477–1484.
  160. P.M. Newberne, S. Broitman, T.F. Schrager, Esophageal carcinogenesis in the rat: zinc deficiency, DNA methylation and alkyltransferase activity, Pathobiology 65 (1997) 253–263.
  161. M.B. Anderson, K. Lepak, V. Farinas, W.J. Geroge, Protective action of zinc against cobalt-induced testicular damage in the mouse, Reprod. Toxicol. 7 (1993) 49–54.
  162. B. Xu, S.E. Chia, C.H. Ong, Concentrations of cadmium, lead, selenium and zinc in human blood and seminal plasma, Biol. Trace Element Res. 40 (1994) 49–57.
  163. P.I. Oteiza, K.L. Olin, C.G. Fraga, C.L. Keen, Zinc deficiency causes oxidative damage to proteins, lipids and DNA in rat testes, J. Nutr. 125 (1995) 823–829.
  164. M. Ruz, C. Castillo-Duran, X. Lara, J. Codoceo, A. Rebolledo, E. Atalah, A 14-mo zinc-supplementation trial in apparently healthy Chilean preschool children, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66 (1997) 1406–1413.
  165. N.W. Solomons, Mild human zinc deficiency produces an imbalance between cell-mediated and humoral immunity, Nutr. Rev. 56 (1998) 27–28.
  166. M.A. Johnson, K.H. Porter, Micronutrient supplementation and infection in institutionalized elders, Nutr. Rev. 55 (1997) 400–404.
  167. G.P. Oakley Jr., Eat right and take a multivitamin (editorial; comment) (see comments), N. Engl. J. Med. 338 (1998) 1060–1061.
  168. B.N. Ames, Micronutrients prevent cancer and delay aging, Toxicol. Lett. 102/103 (1998) 5–18.
  169. B.N. Ames, Micronutrient deficiencies: a major cause of DNA damage, in: H.L. Bradlow, J. Fishman, M.P. Osborne (Eds.), Cancer Prevention: Novel Nutrient and Pharmaceutical Developments, Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1999, pp. 87–106.

 

This paper was adapted, in part, from the work by B.N. Ames [168] and [169].
Present address: Children’s Hosp ORI, 5700 M.L.K. Way Jr., Oakland, CA 94609, USA. Tel.: C1-510-450-7625; fax: C1-510-597-7128.
E-mail address: bnames(at)uclink4.berkeley.edu (B.N. Ames).
0027-5107/01/ – see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. PII: S0027-5107(01)00070-7 8 B.N. Ames / Mutation Research 475 (2001) 7–20 © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Bruce Ames passed away in October 2024.

Vitamins in general, Research references

January 1999

1. Ames BN, Berkeley, Univ. CA et al. High-dose vitamin therapy stimulates variant enzymes with decreased coenzyme binding affinity (increased K-m): relevance to gentic disease and polymorphisms. Am J Clin Nutr, 2002, vol.75, 616-58.
2. Fairfield KM, Fletcher RH, Harvard Medical School, Vitamins for Chronic Disease Prevention in Adults, Scientific Review, JAMA, vol. 287, 3116-26, 2002. (152 refs.)
3. Fletcher RH, Fairffield KM, Vitamins for Chronic Disease Prevention in Adults, Clinical Applications, JAMA, vol. 287, 3127-29, 2002. (23 refs.)

 

Sources
Joseph E. Pizzorno Jr., Michael T. Murrey & Melvyn R. Werbach.